12/13/23 I already have so many ideas, the unibomber manifesto; hypersocialization and sexuality, in light of kaczynski's descision not to transition. Maoist views on homosexuallity, Focault and anti-oedipus, Costin Alamariu with selective breeding and the birth of philosophy. Featuring my historical examples of Meji restoration, hellenistic homosexuality, and the fall of the late persian empire to islam (kacyinski's views on islam as anti-industrial society tie into his repression) . This phenomonon is simply associated with a successful society, and envy over lacking sexual swag leading to collapse (Neitzsche; geneology of morals reference? "ressentiment"?). If capitalist realism is so bad then why'd it make everyone gay and how does one incorporate those elements into a different society?
post industrial society and capitalist realism maximizes gayness by causing people to be both hypersocialized and physically touch starved even in the presence of friends.
Architecturally and aesthetically in every aspect people are intimacy starved through alienation by overwhelming superstructures of cold and post-intimate societies, the only exception is in the small scales where an envirnonment is humanized for commercial purpouses, by a design that suggests a world of indefinitely pre-intimate social connections where a culmination of emotion beyond professional or consumerist does not exist. In other words, the only time the post-industrial environment suggests emotions of familiarity between people is when it is neutered and sterile. The closest thing to intimacy is family-friendly corporate aesthetics. The inhuman and postindustrial semiotics and mythos preceeding the internet era illuminated only the most resiliant form of connection; shame-bonding.

The advancement is also due to panoptocinic culture causing unimagiably powerful shame-bonding for the individualism granted of defying said culture. It's a sign of a highly economically, culturally, and technically advanced and (nominally) successful society to -as a result of surpassing sexuality as an extant form of material needs, end up restraining open human connection until only the bonds so powerful that they distort identity and sense of self(ego) are left. The tragedy lies in whether this outlying model of the individual becomes appropriated as "normal" in the attempt of both the outlying individual and the overarching society's attempt to both defend their own existence by coalessing, and hence the outlying model of sexuality loses it's core tenet of being outside of society- of trancending it.



...and it's AWESOME















Does this image make you feel gay? You may be experiencing the effects of archetectural alienation, which invokes a societies' constructs around panoptoconic culture, and contributes to shame bonding.